Posted by admin on Jun 30, 2010 in Articles | 0 comments
For the first time in history, the world will vote as a whole to tackle the biggest problem our Earth faces-global warming. WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) and other NGOs across the globe have joined hands to target 1 billion votes for Earth Hour 2009, which will be presented to the world leaders at the Global Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen 2009. The meeting will devise concrete steps to tackle global warming in the most effective manner. Earth Hour which kicked off to a resounding success in 2007 at Sydney had 2.2 million homes and businesses switch of their lights for an hour. It reduced the city’s energy consumption by 10.2 percent for one hour. This is equal to having 48,616 vehicles off the road for a year! The move met with a resonating success again in 2008 as well where 50 million people in various parts of the world, switched off their lights for one hour. Earth Hour will next take place on Saturday, March 28, 2009 at 8:30 pm, local time. More than 80 countries and territories including India, have pledged their support to VOTE EARTH during Earth Hour 2009. One of the most well-known personalities in India, actor-director Aamir Khan will be spear-heading the campaign in India. It is expected that a billion people across the world will switch off their lights for one hour from as an endeavor to counter climatic change. Climatic change and global warming is a real problem which requires proactive solutions. It is not a problem of just one country in isolation of other nations; it is a real issue that should elicit a reality check in all of us. It is high time we thought of taking a stand as a planet, rather than looking it from the perspective of a nation. We should all come together and take a call on how we can save the future of the planet. If we do not, the upcoming generation will live in dark, literally speaking and have to make compromises with whatever little resources there is left in the planet.
Want to Live Extra Years?
read more
Posted by admin on Jun 5, 2010 in Articles | 0 comments
On August 6, 1965 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed one of the most important pieces of legislation in America’s history. For the first time, more than 2.5 million African Americans were able to cast their ballots in elections without fear, intimidation or physical harm. The Voting Rights Act abolished literacy tests, poll taxes, grandfather clauses and all other unnecessary requirements that had prevented African Americans from having their voices heard in American politics.
However in 1965, very few Americans could foresee the day when a person, who would have been unable to vote prior to the Voting Rights Act, would receive enough votes to be elected to the world’s highest office in a country where African Americans are still very much in the minority. As a result of Barack Obama’s election as the 44th President of the United States, many have questioned the need for certain provisions of the Voting Rights Act. The Northwest Austin (Texas) Municipal Utility District Number One, a government board dedicated to providing local services to approximately 3,500 people, has recently appealed to the United States Supreme Court to overturn Section 5 of the act, calling it “the most federally invasive law in existence.”
”The elephant in the room is what to make of the Obama election,” said Columbia law professor Nathaniel Persily. “Does the election of the first African American president undermine the central justification for parts of the Voting Rights Act?”
In April, the U.S. Supreme Court will review a lower court ruling that upheld Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which requires all or parts of 16 states with a history of racism, to receive approval before implementing any changes in election procedures. States affected entirely include Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas. States partially affected include California, Florida, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Virginia and South Dakota.
However, the local Texas government at the heart of this litigation argues that they have no history of racial discrimination and many believe that America no longer needs such legislation in a “post-racial society.”
But what does Obama’s election actually imply? Has America completely overcome its racist past or is racism still an obstacle to true equality for people of color?
According to defendersonline.org, a whopping 131 million Americans cast their vote for the next commander-in-chief in November 2008, an eight percent increase from the previous election in 2004. Obama received a total of 53 percent of the vote, which was a significant percentage considering the much closer elections in 2000 and 2004.
African Americans constituted 13 percent of voters, up from 11 percent in 2004, while Hispanics made up nine percent of voters, a one percent increase from the previous presidential election. Furthermore, 95 percent of Americans cast their ballot for President-elect Obama and 67 percent of Hispanics voted for the former senator from Illinois. Most impressively, Obama was able to win 43 percent of the White vote, even though Democrat John Kerry was only able to win over 41 percent of the White vote four years earlier.
Nevertheless, White voters were the only demographic that Obama was not able to win majority support. Furthermore, Obama could only muster support from 10 percent of White voters in Alabama. In addition, many Southern White Democrats stated that they would support Republican John McCain because they could not bring themselves to vote for an African American for president.
Consequently, Obama was forced to obtain secret service protection earlier than any other presidential candidate in history because of assassination threats. According to telegraph.co.uk, the secret service has investigated over 500 death threats against the future president.
Prior to accepting the Democratic nomination for president, Tharin Gartrel and Nathan Johnson were arrested in Denver for making assassination threats towards Obama during the Democratic National Convention. According to CBS station KCNC-TV, one suspect said they were “going to shoot Obama from a high vantage point using a rifle … sighted at 750 yards.”
However, in spite of the conflicting evidence of racial advancement, America’s recent election of President-elect Obama has proven that this country has what it takes to unify despite racial differences. The struggles that those from the Civil Rights era endured led to such monumental achievements as the Voting Rights Act and the historic presidential election of 2008. But it remains to be seen if this is proof of a permanent post-racial society or if race will continue play a factor and legislation such as the Voting Rights Act is necessary to ensure equality.
Want to Live Extra Years?
read more
